Rivista di formazione e aggiornamento professionale del pediatra e del medico di base, fondata nel 1982. In collaborazione con l'Associazione Culturale Pediatri.
Login Abbonamenti Pubblicazioni Carrello Registrazione Perché registrarsi? Contatti

Articolo speciale

Il Global Burden of Disease Study 2010: stime e previsioni su malattie, lesioni e fattori di rischio

The Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010): estimates and forecasts on diseases, injuries and risk factors

Giorgio Tamburlini1, Lorenzo Monasta2

1Centro per la Salute del Bambino, Trieste
2Servizio di Epidemiologia e Biostatistica, IRCCS Materno-Infantile “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste

Gennaio 2013 - pagg. 29 -34

Abstract
The Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) is the largest ever systematic effort to describe the global distribution and causes of a wide array of major diseases, injuries, and health risk factors. The results show that infectious diseases, maternal and child illness, and malnutrition now cause fewer deaths and less illness than they did twenty years ago. As a result, fewer children are dying every year, but more young and middleaged adults are dying and suffering from diseases and injuries, as non-communicable diseases, such as cancer and heart disease, become the dominant causes of death and disability worldwide. Since 1970, men and women worldwide have gained slightly more than ten years of life expectancy overall, but they spend more years living with injury and illness. Blood pressure is the biggest global risk factor for disease, followed by tobacco, alcohol, and poor diet, but child undernutrition and suboptimal breastfeeding remain a key risk factor in sub-Saharan Africa and southeast Asia, where reproductive, newborn, and child diseases remain the top causes of mortality.
Contenuto riservato

Per leggere l'articolo completo è necessario effettuare il login.

Non sei ancora registrato? Registrati

Bibliografia
1. Valent F, Little D, Bertollini R, Nemer LE, Barbone F, Tamburlini G. Burden of disease attributable to selected environmental factors and injury among children and adolescents in Europe. Lancet 2004;363(9426):2032-9. 2. Warren CW, Jones NR, Eriksen MP, Asma S; Global Tobacco Surveillance System (GTSS) Collaborative Group. Patterns of global tobacco use in young people and implications for future chronic disease burden in adults. Lancet 2006;367(9512):749-53. 3. Stevens P. Diseases of poverty and the 10/90 Gap. London: International Policy Network, 2004. 4. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, et al. (Eds). Disease control priorities in developing countries. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2006:35-86. 5. Salomon JA, Vos T, Hogan DR, et al. Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859): 2129-43. 6. Salomon JA, Wang H, Freeman MK, et al. Healthy life expectancy for 187 countries, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380(9859):2144-62. 7. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859): 2095-128. 8. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability- adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859): 2197-223. 9. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859): 2163-96. 10. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859): 2224-60. 11.Watts C, Cairncross S. Should the GBD risk factor rankings be used to guide policy? Lancet 2012;380(9859):2060-1.

Corrispondenza: tamburlini@csbonlus.org