Ricerca
Il percorso decisionale nella scoliosi
The decisional pathway of scoliosis
Flavio D’Osualdo1, Stefano Schierano1, Elisa Battistuzzi2, Silvia Specogna2
1SOS di Riabilitazione Patologie ad Esordio Infantile, 2 Istituto di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, AAS 4 Friuli Centrale (FVG)
Febbraio 2016 - pagg. 103 -110
Abstract
Background - Adolescent scoliosis occurs in 2% of the young aged between 10 and 16;
only 10% usually get worse and this poses the problem of an early identification of evolutive
cases and of avoiding unnecessary treatment in the majority of cases. To recognize
scoliosis the forward bending test is performed and the confirmation comes through
X-rays. Cobb angle along with auxological data and curve pattern are the most important
clinical clues for a therapeutic choice. This comprises observation up to 20°-25°
Cobb, brace up to 45°-50°, and surgery over 50°.
Aim of the Study - To create an algorithm able to describe the clinical behaviour. To use the algorithm to analyze the results of a series of first visits to check the correctness of the referrals on one side and that of the therapeutic choice on the other, defined as congruent or not-congruent with the algorithm.
Materials and Methods - 623 consecutive first visits on adolescents aged 9-15 who were sent to the specialist for scoliosis have been analyzed. Every single case has been considered according to the algorithm, checking the result (discharge, control, brace, and surgery) and the coherence of the clinical decision.
Results - ATR of any degree was present in 92%; those without ATR were considered wrong referrals, the majority having leg length discrepancy. In 2/3 of the cases the ATR was low and the unique decision was observation. X-rays were prescribed in 20% whereas in 8% it was already available. A brace was prescribed in 10% of total cases. In 4 cases a surgical consultation was suggested. Among the 572 cases without previous X-ray, 462 (81%) resulted coherent with the algorithm. Among the 97 incoherent cases, for 39 (7%) the clinical decision was judged as imprudent, for 58 (10%) as invasive. Conclusions - The majority of the cases referred to the specialist had a small ATR, others had no rotation at all. Therefore, there is a problem of selection and to this aim the use of validated instruments (scoliometer, arcometer) as well as of shared objective criteria of selection is essential. 81% of prescriptions of the specialist resulted coherent with the algorithm. Imprudent behaviour usually regards borderline cases; an invasive behaviour can cause unnecessary concern and expenses to the families. The algorithm should be used for a comparison and not as a prescriptive tool.
Aim of the Study - To create an algorithm able to describe the clinical behaviour. To use the algorithm to analyze the results of a series of first visits to check the correctness of the referrals on one side and that of the therapeutic choice on the other, defined as congruent or not-congruent with the algorithm.
Materials and Methods - 623 consecutive first visits on adolescents aged 9-15 who were sent to the specialist for scoliosis have been analyzed. Every single case has been considered according to the algorithm, checking the result (discharge, control, brace, and surgery) and the coherence of the clinical decision.
Results - ATR of any degree was present in 92%; those without ATR were considered wrong referrals, the majority having leg length discrepancy. In 2/3 of the cases the ATR was low and the unique decision was observation. X-rays were prescribed in 20% whereas in 8% it was already available. A brace was prescribed in 10% of total cases. In 4 cases a surgical consultation was suggested. Among the 572 cases without previous X-ray, 462 (81%) resulted coherent with the algorithm. Among the 97 incoherent cases, for 39 (7%) the clinical decision was judged as imprudent, for 58 (10%) as invasive. Conclusions - The majority of the cases referred to the specialist had a small ATR, others had no rotation at all. Therefore, there is a problem of selection and to this aim the use of validated instruments (scoliometer, arcometer) as well as of shared objective criteria of selection is essential. 81% of prescriptions of the specialist resulted coherent with the algorithm. Imprudent behaviour usually regards borderline cases; an invasive behaviour can cause unnecessary concern and expenses to the families. The algorithm should be used for a comparison and not as a prescriptive tool.
Classificazione MeSH
Contenuto riservato
Per leggere l'articolo completo è necessario effettuare il login.
Non sei ancora registrato? Registrati
Bibliografia
1. Lonstein JE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Lancet 1994;344(8934):1407-12.
2. Montgomery F, Willner S. The natural history
of idiopathic scoliosis. Incidence of treatment
in 15 cohorts of children born between
1963 and 1977. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22
(7):772-4.
3. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis.
In: Edwards JW (Ed). Instructional Course
Lectures. The American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons. Ann Arbor 1948;5:261-75.
4. The Terminology Committee of the Scoliosis
Research Society. A glossary of scoliosis
terms. Spine 1976;1:57-8.
5. Bunnell WP. An obiective criterion for scoliosis
screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66
(9):1381-7.
6. D’Osualdo F, Schierano S, Iannis M, Righini
E. The level protractor: a new simple instrument
to measure Cobb angle and back hump.
A validation study. Europa Medicophysica
2000;36:191-6.
7. Morais T, Bernier M, Turcotte F. Age- and
sex-specific prevalence of scoliosis and the value of school screening programs. Am J Public
Health 1985;75(12):1377-80.
8. Soucacos PN, Soucacos PK, Zacharis KC,
Beris AE, Xenakis TA. School-screening for
scoliosis. A prospective epidemiological study
in northwestern and central Greece. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 1997;79(10):1498-503.
9. Bunnel WP. Outcome of spinal screening.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18(12):1572-80.
10. Peterson LE, Nachemson AL. Prediction
of progression of the curve in girls who have
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity.
Logistic regression analysis based on
data from The Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research
Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77
(6):823-7.
11. Huang SC. Cut-off point of the Scoliometer
in school scoliosis screening. Spine (Phila Pa
1976) 1997;22(17):1985-9.
12. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM The prediction of
curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis
during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1984;66(7):1061-71.
13. Bunnell WP. The natural history of idiopathic
scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) 1986;11(8):773-6.
14. Charles YP, Daures JP, de Rosa V, Diméglio
A. Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile
scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) 2006;31(17):1933-42.
15. Sanders JO, Browne RH, Cooney TE, Finegold
DN, McConnell SJ, Margraf SA. Correlates
of the peak height velocity in girls with
idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2006;31(20):2289-95.
16. Dickson RA. Spinal deformity-adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis. Nonoperative treatment.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24(24):2601-6.
17. Hresko MT. Clinical practice. Idiopathic
scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med 2013;
368(9):834-41.
18. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, et al. 2011
SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation
treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during
growth. Scoliosis 2012;7:3.
19. Negrini S, De Mauroy JC, Grivas TB, et al.
Actual evidence in the medical approach to
adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur J
Phys Rehabil Med 2014;50(1):87-92.
20. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs
MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with
idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013;
369(16):1512-21.
21. Battistuzzi E. Il percorso decisionale nella
scoliosi idiopatica dell’adolescente: verifica di
un algoritmo. Tesi di Laurea in Medicina. Università
di Udine, 2015.
22. Risser JC. The Iliac apophysis; an invaluable
sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin
Orthop 1958;11:111-9.
23. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas
of skeletal development of the hand and wrist.
Stanfort, California: Stanfort University Press,
1950.
24. Raimondi P, Dupre JM. Evalutation chiffrée
de la rotation vertébrale. Kinésithérapie
Scientifique 1996;358:19-22.
25. D’Osualdo F, Schierano S, Iannis M. Validation
of clinical measurement of kyphosis
with a simple instrument, the arcometer. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22(4):408-13.
26. Lee CF, Fong DY, Cheung KM, et al. Referral
criteria for school scoliosis screening:
assessment and recommendations based on a
large longitudinally followed cohort. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(25):E1492-8.
27. Levy AR, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Hanley
JA, Poitras B. Reducing the lifetime risk of
cancer from spinal radiographs among people
with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(13):1540-7.
28. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE. Effectiveness
of treatment with a brace in girls who have
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective,
controlled study based on data from the
Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77(6):815-22.
Corrispondenza: flavio.dosualdo@aas4.sanita.fvg.it