Farmacoriflessioni
La profilassi dell’infezione da virus respiratorio sinciziale: dal palivizumab al nirsevimab
Prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection: from palivizumab to nirsevimab, what evidence?
Michela Servadio1, Valeria Belleudi1, Federico Marchetti2, Antonio Addis1
1Dipartimento di Epidemiologia della Regione Lazio, ASL Roma 1, Roma
2UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia, Ospedale di Ravenna, AUSL della Romagna
Dicembre 2022 - pagg. 632 -639 | DOI: 10.53126/MEB41632
Abstract
The Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is considered the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in children aged < 2 years. In high-risk children, including preterm infants, or in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and infants with congenital heart diseases (CHD), RSV infections may lead to severe consequences that often require hospitalizations. The typical seasonality of RSV is going through some changes and as consequence the healthcare management of serious infections is facing some difficulties. In this context and in light of the worldwide economic, political and healthcare debate around treatment of RSV infections, this article aims to inform physicians and healthcare professionals about evidence regarding the two drugs licensed for passive prophylaxis against RSV, namely palivizumab and nirsevimab. According to the 1998 IMpact study, palivizumab administration (5 monthly doses) was able to reduce the incidence of RSV hospitalizations in infants born preterm and in those with BPD. However, over the years, several studies found questionable cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the use of palivizumab in preterm infants born at ≥ 29 weeks of gestation. Differently from palivizumab, one single dose of nirsevimab is able to protect over an entire RSV season. This drug was able to reduce hospitalizations and medically attended RSV-associated LRTI in infants born preterm and without comorbidities, but none similar efficacy was found in reducing hospitalizations in healthy infants born at term (born at ≥ 35 weeks of gestation). As such, while future interventions in the clinical management of RSV infections and related consequences are warranted, new evidence about nirsevimab and palivizumab use will be essential to define which population will benefit the most from passive prophylaxis.
Riassunto
Il virus respiratorio sinciziale (VRS) è la prima causa di infezioni del tratto respiratorio inferiore (ITRI) nei primi anni di vita, tali infezioni possono provocare nei bambini a rischio conseguenze gravi, incluso il ricovero. Considerando le alterazioni che sta recentemente subendo la tipica stagionalità del VRS, con ripercussioni nella gestione sanitaria dei casi più gravi di infezione, e alla luce del dibattito economico, politico e sanitario che accompagna da anni la lotta al virus, questo articolo ha l’obiettivo di riportare le evidenze riguardanti i due farmaci attualmente autorizzati per le profilassi passiva contro il VRS: il palivizumab e il nirsevimab. Secondo lo studio IMpact del 1998, il palivizumab ha ridotto in maniera statisticamente significativa le ospedalizzazioni successive a infezione da VRS nei bambini nati pretermine e in quelli con displasia broncopolmonare, tuttavia le evidenze riguardanti i pretermine con un’età gestazione ≥ 29 settimane, sono state costellate negli anni da risultati di dubbia costo-efficacia, aspetto sostenuto anche dalle linee guida dell’American Academy of Pediatrics, pubblicate nel 2014. Il nirsevimab, in grado di proteggere durante un’intera stagione VRS con un’unica dose, anziché le 5 dosi raccomandate per il palivizumab, si è mostrato efficace nel ridurre le ospedalizzazioni e le ITRI più gravi nei bambini nati pretermine e senza comorbidità, ma non si è mostrato altrettanto efficace nel ridurre le ospedalizzazioni in bambini sani nati a termine (con età gestazionale ≥ 35 settimane). Alla luce di questi risultati e considerando che le recenti alterazioni della stagionalità del VRS richiederanno un intervento nella gestione delle infezioni e delle relative conseguenze, sarà essenziale in futuro affiancare l’utilizzo del nirsevimab e del palivizumab a un maggior numero di evidenze, al fine di definire quale popolazione può realmente beneficiare della profilassi passiva.
Parole chiave
Classificazione MeSH
Contenuto riservato
Per leggere l'articolo completo è necessario effettuare il login.
Non sei ancora registrato? Registrati
Bibliografia
1. Bont L, Checchia PA, Fauroux B, et al. Defining the Epidemiology and Burden of Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Among Infants and Children in Western Countries. Infect Dis Ther 2016;5(3):271-98. doi: 10.1007/s40121-016-0123-0.
2. Glezen WP, Taber LH, Frank AL, Kasel JA. Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Dis Child 1986;140(6):543-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140200053026.
3. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med 2009;360(6):588-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804877.
4. McLaurin KK, Farr AM, Wade SW, Diakun DR, Stewart DL. Respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization outcomes and costs of full-term and preterm infants. J Perinatol 2016;36(11):990-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.113.
5. Havdal LB, Bøås H, Bekkevold T, et al. Risk factors associated with severe disease in respiratory syncytial virus infected children under 5 years of age. Front Pediatr 2022;10: 1004739. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1004739.
6. Boyce TG, Mellen BG, Mitchel EF Jr, Wright PF, Griffin MR. Rates of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection among children in medicaid. J Pediatr 2000;137(6): 865-70. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.110531.
7. Friedman D, Fryzek J, Jiang X, Bloomfield A, Ambrose CS, Wong PC. Respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization risk in the second year of life by specific congenital heart disease diagnoses. PLoS One 2017;12(3): e0172512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172512.
8. Li Y, Wang X, Blau DM, et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022;399(10340):2047-64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00478-0.
9. Scheltema NM, Gentile A, Lucion F, et al. Global respiratory syncytial virus-associated mortality in young children (RSV GOLD): a retrospective case series [published correction appears in Lancet Glob Health 2017;5 (12):e1190]. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5(10): e984-e991. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17) 30344-3.
10. Obando-Pacheco P, Justicia-Grande AJ, Rivero-Calle I, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Seasonality: A Global Overview. J Infect Dis 2018;217(9):1356-64. doi: 10.1093/infdis/ jiy056.
11. Staadegaard L, Caini S, Wangchuk S, et al. Defining the seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus around the world: National and subnational surveillance data from 12 countries. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2021;15(6):732-41. doi: 10.1111/irv.12885.
12.Marchetti F. L’autunno che verrà. Medico e Bambino 2022;41(7):416-7. doi: 10.53126/ MEB41416.
13. Tenenbaum T, Doenhardt M, Diffloth N, Berner R, Armann JP. High burden of RSV hospitalizations in Germany 2021-2022. Infection 2022;50(6):1587-90. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01889-6.
14. Jia R, Lu L, Su L, et al. Resurgence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Children in Shanghai, China. Front Microbiol 2022;13: 938372. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.938372.
15. Eden JS, Sikazwe C, Xie R, et al. Off-season RSV epidemics in Australia after easing of COVID-19 restrictions. Nat Commun 2022;13(1):2884. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30485-3.
16. Loconsole D, Centrone F, Rizzo C, et al. Out-of-Season Epidemic of Respiratory Syncytial Virus during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The High Burden of Child Hospitalization in an Academic Hospital in Southern Italy in 2021. Children (Basel) 2022;9(6):848. doi: 10.3390/children9060848.
17. Mazur NI, Higgins D, Nunes MC, et al. The respiratory syncytial virus vaccine landscape: lessons from the graveyard and promising candidates [published correction appears in Lancet Infect Dis 2018 Jul 25]. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18(10):e295-e311. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30002-7.
18. [No authors listed]. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. The IM-pact-RSV Study Group. Pediatrics 1998;102(3 Pt 1):531-7.
19. [No authors listed]. Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections: indications for the use of palivizumab and update on the use of RSV-IGIV. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee of Fetus and Newborn. Pediatrics 1998; 102(5):1211-6. doi: 10.1542/ peds.102.5.1211.
20. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases; American Academy of Pediatrics Bronchiolitis Guidelines Committee. Updated guidance for palivi-zumab prophylaxis among infants and young children at increased risk of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection [published correction appears in Pediatrics 2014;134(6):1221]. Pediatrics 2014;134 (2): 415-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1665.
21. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases; American Academy of Pediatrics Bronchiolitis Guidelines Committee. Updated guidance for palivizumab prophylaxis among infants and young children at increased risk of hospitaliza-tion for respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics 2014;134(2):e620-e638. doi: 10.1542/ peds.2014-1666.
22. Weiner LB, Masaquel AS, Polak MJ, Mahadevia PJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of palivizumab among pre-term infant populations covered by Medicaid in the United States. J Med Econ 2012;15(5):997-1018. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.672942.
23. Mahadevia PJ, Masaquel AS, Polak MJ, Weiner LB. Cost utility of palivizumab prophylaxis among pre-term infants in the United States: a national policy perspective. J Med Econ 2012;15(5):987-96. doi: 10.3111/ 13696998.2012.690013.
24. Wang D, Bayliss S, Meads C. Palivizumab for immunoprophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis in high-risk infants and young children: a systematic review and additional economic modelling of subgroup analyses. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15(5):iii-124. doi: 10.3310/hta15050.
25. Ginsberg GM, Somekh E, Schlesinger Y. Should we use Palivizumab immunoprophylaxis for infants against respiratory syncytial virus? - a cost-utility analysis. Isr J Health Policy Res 2018;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0258-4.
26. Buckley BC, Roylance D, Mitchell MP, Patel SM, Cannon HE, Dunn JD. Description of the outcomes of prior authorization of palivizumab for prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in a managed care organization. J Manag Care Pharm 2010;16(1):15-22. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.1.15.
27. Newby B, Sorokan T. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Rates with Limited Use of Palivizumab for Infants Born at 29 to 31+6/7 Weeks Gestational Age. Can J Hosp Pharm 2017;70(1):13-8. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v70i1.1623.
28. Belleudi V, Trotta F, Pinnarelli L, Davoli M, Addis A. Neonatal outcomes following new reimbursement limitations on palivizumab in Italy. Arch Dis Child 2018;103(12): 1163-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315349.
29. Belleudi V, Marchetti F, Finocchietti M, Davoli M, Addis A. Palivizumab reimbursement criteria and neonatal RSV hospitalisation: a regional retrospective review. BMJ Paediatr Open 2021;5(1):e000985. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000985.
30. Addis A, Belleudi V, Trotta F, Pinnarelli L, Davoli M. Esiti neonatali e criteri di rimborso per il palivizumab. Medico e Bambino 2018;37(10):636-40.
31. Levin JC, Beam AL, Fox KP, Hayden LP. Cost Savings Without Increased Risk of Respiratory Hospitalization for Preterm Children after the 2014 Palivizumab Policy Update. Am J Perinatol 2022 Aug 25. doi: 10.1055/ a-1845-2184.
32. Addis A, Bonati M, Marchetti F. Registrazione, rimborso e uso appropriato dei farma-ci non sono sinonimi: il caso del palivizumab. Medico e Bambino 2016;35(8):507-12.
33. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. May 30, 2015, n 124. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/gu/2015/05/30/124/sg/pdf (accessed October 10, 2022).
34. Bollani L, Baraldi E, Chirico G, et al. (a cura di) per la Società Italiana di Neonatologia Raccomandazioni sulla profilassi dell’infezione da virus respiratorio sinciziale (VRS) con il palivizumab. Milano: Biomedia Eds, 2015.
35. SIN Lombardia - Documento di indirizzo della SIN-Sezione Lombarda per la profilassi dell’infezione da Virus Respiratorio Sinciziale con palivizumab. Milano, 2015.
36. Commissione Tecnica Regionale Farmaci Linee di indirizzo per l’impiego del medicinale Synagis (palivizumab) nella Regione del Veneto.
37. Gruppo di Lavoro regionale della Regione Emilia Romagna (a cura di). Palivizumab della profilassi stagionale delle infezioni da virus respiratorio sinciziale. Medico e Bambino pagine elettroniche 2018;21(10).
38. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. November 9, 2017, n 262 (accessed October 10 2022).
39. European Medicines Agency. 15 November 2022. https://www.ema.europa.eu/ en/medicines/human/EPAR/beyfortus(accessed November 25, 2022).
40. Griffin MP, Yuan Y, Takas T, et al. Single-Dose Nirsevimab for Prevention of RSV in Preterm Infants [published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2020;383(7):698]. N Engl J Med 2020;383(5):415-25. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1913556.
41. Hammitt LL, Dagan R, Yuan Y, et al. Nirsevimab for Prevention of RSV in Healthy Late-Preterm and Term Infants. N Engl J Med 2022;386(9):837-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110275.
42. Domachowske J, Madhi SA, Simões EAF, et al. Safety of Nirsevimab for RSV in Infants with Heart or Lung Disease or Prematurity. N Engl J Med 2022;386(9):892-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2112186.
43. American Academy of Pediatrics. Updated Guidance: Use of Palivizumab Prophylaxis to Prevent Hospitalization From Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection During the 2022-2023 RSV Season. American Academy of Pediatrics; November 2022 (accessed November 25, 2022).
44. American Academy of Pediatrics. Interim Guidance for Use of Palivizumab Prophylaxis to Prevent Hospitalization From Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection During the Current Atypical Interseasonal RSV Spread; August 2021 (accessed November 25, 2022).
Corrispondenza: a.addis@deplazio.it
