Rivista di formazione e aggiornamento professionale del pediatra e del medico di base, fondata nel 1982. In collaborazione con l'Associazione Culturale Pediatri.
Login Abbonamenti Pubblicazioni Carrello Registrazione Perché registrarsi? Contatti

Prevenzione

PDF

A proposito dello screening uditivo

EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF DEAFNESS IN INFANTS

STEFANO CHIAPPE

Centro di Medicina Preventiva Pediatrica, Patologia e Terapia Intensiva Neonatale, Universitŕ di Cagliari

Marzo 1997 - pagg. 180 -182

Abstract
Although a screening approach is widely accepted as the method of choice for early detection of hearing loss in infants, in spite of recurring proposals of new methods, the “ideal” procedure has not yet been found. Thus, only limited success has been obtained with screening programs. The Author suggests thet better results can be obtained with alternative strategies, based on surveillance methods. Longitudinal hearing surveillance based on the central role of pediatricians and parents can be pursued by using simple, not invasive methods, like the BOEL test and questionnaires.

Bibliografia

1. Junker S: Selective attention in infants and consecutive communicative behavior. Acta Pediat Scand, Suppl 231, 1, 1972.
2. Vohr BR, Maxon AB: Screening infants for hearing impairment. The Journal of Pediatrics 128, 711, 1996.
3. Watkins PM: Neonatal otoacustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 74, F16, 1996.
4. Joint Committee on infant hearing: Rapporto del 1994. Pediatrics (ed. it.) 7, 2, 171, 1995.
5. Simmons FB: Identification of hearing loss in infants and young children. Otolaryngologic Clinics in North America 11, 19, 1978.
6. Scanlon PE, Bamford JM: Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods. Arch Dis Child 65, 479, 1990.
7. Chiappe S: Il ruolo e le possibilitŕ operative del pediatra di base nel depistage precoce della sorditŕ infantile. Il Pediatra 6, Giugno 1988.
8. Chiappe S, Di Ninni S, Palmas G, Chiappe F et al: Screening audiologico precoce in bambini a rischio: confronto di tre diverse metodiche. Riv Ital Ped 14, 1, 1988.