Ricerca
SPECIALE RICERCA Un Audit su 4 malattie e 104 ospedali
HOSPITAL SURVEY ON MANAGEMENT OF PNEUMONIA, ASTHMA, URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS AND RECURRENT ABDOMINAL PAIN IN CHILDHOOD
A CURA DEL GRUPPO DI STUDIO DELLA PEDIATRIA OSPEDALIERA
Aprile 1999 - pagg. 227 -235
Abstract
Objectives: To assess quality of care for 4 common diseases (pneumonia,
asthma, urinary tract infections and recurrent abdominal
pain) in a large sample of italian paediatric inpatient services; to
evaluate feasibility and usefulness of a network of paediatric hospital
service aimed at improving quality of care through peer review
of case-management practices.
Methods: 104 paediatric hospital services were involved and 2141
cases were analyzed: 1212 cases of pneumonia (P), 391 cases of
asthma (A), 288 of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) and 250 of
acute pyelonephritis (APN) were assessed; admission procedures,
diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, lenght of hospital stay
and other relevant information was recorded on an ad hoc data
recording form and then analyzed by a group of paediatricians
belonging to the hospital services involved in the study.
Results: The observed case-management practices differed significantly
from the currently accepted recommendations in many
aspects. Only a third of hospital admissions was directly referred
by the family paediatricians. Diagnostic procedures were often
overabundant, while in one specific instance (RAP) they failed to
meet the minimum requisites. In over half of BP and APN cases antibiotics
were administered parenterally without clear indications.
Instructions for self-management of A appeared insufficient so that
the rate of recurrent admissions for A was too high. The lenght of
hospital stay for each disease was variable across paediatric services
without any real difference in the severity of cases. The findings
were ultimately presented and discussed with the participation of a
large proportion of the hospitals involved in the survey. The need
for establishing guidelines for the case-management of the most
common paediatric diseases was widely recognized.
Conclusions: Interinstitutional peer review of clinical practices is a
feasible and useful approach to assessing and improving quality of
care in paediatric hospital services.
Parole chiave
Suggerite dall'AI
