Screening: luci e ombre
Screening ecografico delle malformazioni fetali
D. Baronciani
Febbraio 1998 - pagg. 111 -112
Classificazione MeSH
Bibliografia
1. Baronciani D, Scaglia C, Corchia C,
Torcetta F, Mastroiacovo PP: Ultrasonography
in pregnancy and fetal abnormalities:
screening or diagnostic test? IPIMC
1986-1990 Register Data. Prenat Diagn
15, 1101-1108, 1995.
2. Berkowitz RL: Should every pregnant woman undergo ultrasonography? New Engl J Med 329, 874-875, 1993.
3. Bernaschek G, Stuempflen I, Deufinger J: Value of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations: different results between indication-based and screeningbased investigations. Prenat Diagn 14, 807-812, 1994.
4. Bucher HC, Schmidt JG: Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures. BMJ 307, 13-16, 1993.
5. Chitty LS, Hunt GH, Moore J, Lobb MO: Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population, BMJ 303, 1165-1169, 1991.
6. Crane JP, Lefevre ML, Winborn NC, Evans JK, Ewigman BG, Bain RP, Frigoletto FD, McNellis D: A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(2), 392-399, 1994.
7. Ewigman BG, LeFevre M, Hesser J: A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 76, 189-194, 1990.
8. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, Mc Nellis DD and RADIUS Study Group: Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 329, 821-827, 1993.
9. Grimes DA: Technology follies: the uncritical acceptance of medical innovation. JAMA 269, 3030-3033, 1993.
10. Julian-Reynier C, Philip N, Scheiner C, Aurran Y, Chabal F, Maron A, Gombert A, Ayme S: Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France. J Epidemiol Community Health 48, 290-296, 1994.
11. Keirse MJNC: Frequent prenatal ultrasound: time to think again. Lancet 342, 878-879, 1993.
12. Mastroiacovo PP, Botto LD, Castilla E: I registri delle malformazioni congenite: una valutazione critica. Prospettive in Pediatria 24, 227-233, 1994.
13. McCurdy CM, Seeds JW: Route of delivery of infants with congenital anomalies. Clinics in Perinatology 20, 1, 81-107, 1993.
14. Romero R: Routine obstetric ultrasound (editorial). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3, 303-307, 1993.
15. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP, Finck S: Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis by a registry of congenital abnomalies. Prenat Diagn 12, 263-270, 1992.
2. Berkowitz RL: Should every pregnant woman undergo ultrasonography? New Engl J Med 329, 874-875, 1993.
3. Bernaschek G, Stuempflen I, Deufinger J: Value of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations: different results between indication-based and screeningbased investigations. Prenat Diagn 14, 807-812, 1994.
4. Bucher HC, Schmidt JG: Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures. BMJ 307, 13-16, 1993.
5. Chitty LS, Hunt GH, Moore J, Lobb MO: Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population, BMJ 303, 1165-1169, 1991.
6. Crane JP, Lefevre ML, Winborn NC, Evans JK, Ewigman BG, Bain RP, Frigoletto FD, McNellis D: A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on the detection, management and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(2), 392-399, 1994.
7. Ewigman BG, LeFevre M, Hesser J: A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 76, 189-194, 1990.
8. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, Mc Nellis DD and RADIUS Study Group: Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 329, 821-827, 1993.
9. Grimes DA: Technology follies: the uncritical acceptance of medical innovation. JAMA 269, 3030-3033, 1993.
10. Julian-Reynier C, Philip N, Scheiner C, Aurran Y, Chabal F, Maron A, Gombert A, Ayme S: Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France. J Epidemiol Community Health 48, 290-296, 1994.
11. Keirse MJNC: Frequent prenatal ultrasound: time to think again. Lancet 342, 878-879, 1993.
12. Mastroiacovo PP, Botto LD, Castilla E: I registri delle malformazioni congenite: una valutazione critica. Prospettive in Pediatria 24, 227-233, 1994.
13. McCurdy CM, Seeds JW: Route of delivery of infants with congenital anomalies. Clinics in Perinatology 20, 1, 81-107, 1993.
14. Romero R: Routine obstetric ultrasound (editorial). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3, 303-307, 1993.
15. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP, Finck S: Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis by a registry of congenital abnomalies. Prenat Diagn 12, 263-270, 1992.