Giugno 2014 - pagg. 361 -368
Newborn hearing screening programmes, voluntarily carried out or regulated by regional
norms, have developed themselves into a standardized health organization system
in several Italian regions in a few years. Hospital-based programmes are generally structured
to achieve a high coverage of the newborn population, are widely recognized as
the standard of care and have a good level of knowledge among the stakeholders. It is
however necessary to exploit the screening potential as well as to improve the diagnostic
evaluation and the early intervention process. This implies the need to increase the
capacity of paediatric audiological services. A further requirement is to standardize the
auditory surveillance and vigilance practice, in order to comprise children who missed
the screening test, and to support detection of cases that develop a progressive or lateonset
hearing loss. The principal aim will be to develop an integrated healthcare model
of early hearing detection and intervention, which links the hospital and the territory,
and avoids -or minimizes- the developmental communication delays that are typically
observed in hearing impaired children with late diagnosis and treatment. The next future
encompasses the opportunity to combine diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative innovations
with the experience achieved by the regions where universal newborn hearing
screening programmes have been already set.
Bibliografia
1. Atti del Congresso “Definizione, caratteristiche
e cause del deficit uditivo infantile”. In:
Udito, Linguaggio, Comunicazione. Cap.1. Padova:
Cortina Ed. 2009.
2. Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing
screening: a silent revolution. N Engl J Med
2006;354:2151-64.
3. Cristobal R, Oghalai JS. Hearing loss in children
with very low birth weight: current review
of epidemiology and pathophysiology.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:
F462-8.
4. Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ, Marshall
DH, Davis AC, Bamford JM. Prevalence of
permanent childhood hearing impairment in
the United Kingdom and implications for universal
neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire
based ascertainment study. BMJ 2001;
323:536-40.
5. Watkin P. Postneonatal care pathways and
the identification of deafness (Clinical report).
Arch Dis Child 2012;97:31-3.
6. Watkin P, Baldwin M. The longitudinal follow
up of a universal neonatal hearing screen:
the implications for confirming deafness in
childhood. Int J Audiol 2012;51:519-28.
7. Davis A, Davis AS. Descriptive epidemiology
of childhood Hearing impairment in comprehensive
handbook of pediatric audiology.
Seeewald R, Tharpe AM (Eds). Plural Publishing,
2011:85-111.
8. US Department of Health and Human Services
(DHHS) 1990. Healthy people 2000: nationale
health promotion and disease prevention
objectives. Washington DC: Public Health
Service.
9. Kuhl PK. Brain mechanism in early language
acquisition. Neuron 2010;67:713-27.
10. Macchi Cassia V, Valenza E, Simion F. Lo
sviluppo cognitivo. Dalle teorie classiche ai
nuovi orientamenti. Bologna: il Mulino Ed.,
2004.
11. Kral A. Auditory critical periods: a review
from system’s perspective. Neuroscience
2013;247:117-33.
12. Kral A, Sharma A. Developmental neuroplasticity
after coclea implantation. Trends in
Neurosciences 2012;35:111-222.
13. Kral A, O’Donoghue GM. Profound deafness
in childhood. N Engl J Med 2010;363:
1438-50.
14. Moeller MP. Early intervention and language
development in children who are deaf
and hard of hearing. Pediatrics 2000;106(3):
E43.
15. Russ SA, Poulakis Z, Wake M, et al. The
distraction test: the last word? J Paediatr Child
Health 2005;41:197-200.
16. American Academy of Otolaryngology,
American College of Medical Genetics, Joint
Committee on Infant Hearing, et al. http://
www.infanthearing.org/resources_home/positionstatements/
index.html.
17. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year
2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines
for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention
Programs. Pediatrics 2007;120:898-
921.
18. Generalità di Giunta Regionale del Friuli
Venezia Giulia n 1122 del 15.6.2012 “Programma
Regionale di Screening Uditivo Universale,
Sorveglianza e Valutazione Audiologica”.
19. Delibera Regionale della Toscana n. 365,
21 Maggio 2007 “Progetto speciale Nascere in
Toscana: attivazione in tutte le Aziende Sanitarie
dello screening audiologico neonatale
entro il 30.10.2007”.
20. Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale dell’Umbria
21.5.2007 “Attivazione dello screening
audiologico neonatale”.
21. Deliberazione n. 2267 della Giunta Regionale
della Campania del 12.2.2007. “Progetto
per il monitoraggio e il sostegno allo screening
neonatale universale dei disturbi permanenti
dell’udito”.
22. Delibera della Giunta Regionale della Regione
Lazio n. 115 del 23.3.2012. “Linea d’azione
screening uditivo neonatale universale.
Programma di attivazione e messa a regime”.
23. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK,
Mehl AL. Language of early and later identified
children with hearing loss. Pediatrics
1998;102:1161-71.
24. Niparko JK1, Tobey EA, Thal DJ, et al.
Spoken language development in children following
cochlear implantation. JAMA 2010;303:
1498-506.
25. Shulman S, Besculides M, Saltzman A,
Ireys H, White KR, Forsman I. Evaluation of
the universal newborn screening and intervention
program. Pediatrics 2010;126:19-27.
26. Young NM, Reilly BK, Burke L. Limitations
of universal newborn hearing screening
in early identification of pediatric cochlear implant
candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 2011;137:230-4.
27. Muse C, Harrison J, Yoshinaga-Itano C, et
al.; Joint Committee on Infant Hearing of the
American Academy of Pediatrics. Principles
and guidelines for early intervention after confirmation
that a child is deaf or hard of hearing.
Pediatrics 2013;131:e1324-49.
28. Dedhia K, Kitsko D, Sabo D, Chi DH. Children
With Sensorineural Hearing Loss After
Passing the Newborn Hearing Screen. JAMA
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:119-23.
29. Houston HT, Bradham TS, Muñoz KF, Guignard
GH. Newborn Hearing Screening: an
analysis of current practices. The Volta Review
2011;111:109-20.
30. Hoffman J, Muñoz KF, Bradham TS, Nelson
L. Loss to Follow-Up: Issues and Recommendations.
The Volta Review 2011;111:165-
80.
31. Bradham TS, Hoffman J, Houston KT. Data
Management in the EHDI System. The Volta
Review 2011;111:243-54.
32. Bradham TS, Houston KT, Guignard GH,
Hoffman J. Strategic Analysis of Family Support
in EHDI Systems. The Volta Review 2011;
111:181-94.
33. Nelson L, Houston KT, Hoffman J, Bradham
TS. Interdisciplinary Collaboration in
EHDI Programs. The Volta Review 2011;111:
267-80.
34. http://www.ccm-network.it/imgs/C_27_
MAIN_page_881_listaFile_List11_itemName_
6_file.pdf.
35. Legge 21 novembre 1988, n. 508 (“Norme
integrative in materia di assistenza economica
agli invalidi civili, ai ciechi civili e ai sordomuti”).
36. Legge 11 ottobre 1990, n. 289 (“Modifiche
alla disciplina delle indennità di accompagnamento
di cui alla L. 21 novembre 1988, n. 508,
recante norme integrative in materia di assistenza
economica agli invalidi civili, ai ciechi
civili e ai sordomuti e istituzione di un’indennità
di frequenza per i minori invalidi”).