Ricerca
Ambliopia: modalità di invio allo specialista oftalmologo e ruolo dello screening pediatrico
Amblyopia:referral to ophtalmologists and role of the pediatric vision screening
Eleonora Cosmo1, Sara Dalla Torre1, Stefano Pensiero2, Maurizio Madonia2
1Dipartimento Universitario-Clinico di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e della Salute, Università di Trieste
2SC di Oculistica e Strabologia, IRCCS Materno-Infantile “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste
Aprile 2018 - pagg. 236 -242
Abstract
Rationale - Amblyopia is the first cause of monocular vision deficit; in order to limit the
damages due to this condition, an early diagnosis is important, because amblyopia is
reversible only if treated within a small period of time.
Objectives - The study aims to investigate the modalities and the reasons why children come to ophthalmologists’ attention, the main causes of amblyopia and the importance of the age of referral in relation to the outcome of the treatment.
Materials and methods - The present retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology and Strabology of IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” in Trieste, Italy and involved 222 patients with a diagnosis of monocular amblyopia, defined as a difference of more than 2/10 between the two eyes in corrected visual acuity. For each patient age at first and last visit, modalities and causes of referral to an ophtalmologist, etiology of amblyopia and type of amblyogenic factor, as well as initial and final visual acuity were examined.
Results - 129 patients (58%) were sent to an ophthalmologist by their paediatricians, 69 (31%) by their parents, 24 patients (11%) through other modalities. The abnormalities found were more frequently visual acuity alterations (41%) and strabismus (36%). The observed causes of amblyopia were: refractive amblyopia (57%), more often due to a hypermetropic anisometropia; strabismic amblyopia (34%), mainly due to constant esotropia; and deprivation amblyopia (9%), more often due to congenital cataract or ptosis. Residual amblyopia (after the treatment) was observed only among patients sent to an ophthalmologist after the age of 6 years. Refractive amblyopia is the most common and less severe. The age of the diagnosis of amblyopia influences significantly the outcome, which is poorer if the pathology is diagnosed after the age of 6 years.
Conclusions - The majority of amblyopic children undergo an ophthalmologic examination between the age of 3 and 4 years, sent by their paediatrician mainly because of visus abnormalities and strabismus; strabismus is usually noticed by parents and can elude paediatricians. For this reason a continuous update on methods of strabismus evaluation is recommended.
Objectives - The study aims to investigate the modalities and the reasons why children come to ophthalmologists’ attention, the main causes of amblyopia and the importance of the age of referral in relation to the outcome of the treatment.
Materials and methods - The present retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology and Strabology of IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” in Trieste, Italy and involved 222 patients with a diagnosis of monocular amblyopia, defined as a difference of more than 2/10 between the two eyes in corrected visual acuity. For each patient age at first and last visit, modalities and causes of referral to an ophtalmologist, etiology of amblyopia and type of amblyogenic factor, as well as initial and final visual acuity were examined.
Results - 129 patients (58%) were sent to an ophthalmologist by their paediatricians, 69 (31%) by their parents, 24 patients (11%) through other modalities. The abnormalities found were more frequently visual acuity alterations (41%) and strabismus (36%). The observed causes of amblyopia were: refractive amblyopia (57%), more often due to a hypermetropic anisometropia; strabismic amblyopia (34%), mainly due to constant esotropia; and deprivation amblyopia (9%), more often due to congenital cataract or ptosis. Residual amblyopia (after the treatment) was observed only among patients sent to an ophthalmologist after the age of 6 years. Refractive amblyopia is the most common and less severe. The age of the diagnosis of amblyopia influences significantly the outcome, which is poorer if the pathology is diagnosed after the age of 6 years.
Conclusions - The majority of amblyopic children undergo an ophthalmologic examination between the age of 3 and 4 years, sent by their paediatrician mainly because of visus abnormalities and strabismus; strabismus is usually noticed by parents and can elude paediatricians. For this reason a continuous update on methods of strabismus evaluation is recommended.
Parole chiave
Suggerite dall'AI
Classificazione MeSH
Contenuto riservato
Per leggere l'articolo completo è necessario effettuare il login.
Non sei ancora registrato? Registrati
Bibliografia
1. Holmes JM, Clarke MP. Amblyopia. Lancet
2006;367:1343-51.
2. Webber AL, Wood J. Amblyopia: prevalence,
natural history, functional effects and treatment.
Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:365-75.
3. DeSantis D. Amblyopia. Pediatr Clin North
Am 2014;61:505-18.
4. Angi M, Murgia V. Valutazione della capacità
visiva per identificare i difetti ambliogenici.
Medico e Bambino 2009;28:573-8.
5. de Zárate BR, Tejedor J. Current concepts
in the management of amblyopia. Clin
Ophthalmol 2007;1:403-14.
6. Jefferis JM, Connor AJ, Clarke MP. Amblyopia.
BMJ 2015:351:h5811.
7. Kulp MT, Cotter SA, Connor AJ, Clarke MP.
Should amblyopia be treated? Ophthalmic
Physiol Opt 2014;34:226-32.
8. Daw NW. Critical periods and amblyopia.
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:502-5.
9. Elflein HM. Amblyopie. Ophtalmologie
2016;113:283-8.
10. Woodruff G, Hiscox F, Thompson JR,
Smith LK. The presentation of children with
amblyopia. Eye 1994;8:623-6.
11. Bell AM, Rodes ME, Kellar LC. Childhood
eye examination. Am Fam Physician 2013;88:
241-8.
12. Donahue SP, Baker CN. Procedures for
the evaluation of the visual system by pediatricians.
Pediatrics 2016;137:1-9.
13. Buch H, Vinding T. Acute acquired comitant
esotropia of childhood: a classification based
on 48 children. Acta Ophtalmol 2015;93:
568-74.
14. Koning HJ, Groenewoud JH, Lantau K, et
al. Effectiveness of screening for amblyopia
and other eye disorders in a prospective birth
cohort study. J Med Screen 2013;20:66-72.
15. Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad R, Sparrow
J, Harvey I. Amblyopia treatment outcomes
after preschool screening v school entry
screening: observational data from a prospective
cohort study. Br J Ophtlalmology 2003;
87:988-93.
16. Sengpiel F. Plasticity of the visual cortex
and treatment of amblyopia. Curr Biol 2014;
24:936-40.
17. Berardi N, Sale A, Maffei L. Brain structural
and functional development: genetics and
experience. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57:4-
9.
18. Hensch TK. Critical period plasticity in local
cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005;
6:877-88.
19. Solebo AL, Cumberland PM, Rahi JS.
Whole-population vision screening in children
aged 4‑5 years to detect amblyopia. Lancet
2015;385:2308-19.
20. Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus Preferred
Practice Pattern Panel. Amblyopia Preferred
Practice Pattern guidelines. American
Academy of Ophthalmology, 2012.
21. Bright Futures/American Academy of Pediatrics.
Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric
Health Care 2016.
22. American Academy of Family Physicians.
Summary of recommendations for clinical preventive
services, 2016.
23. US Preventive Services Task Force. Vision
screening for children 1 to 5 years of age: US
Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
statement. Pediatrics 2011;127:340-346.
24. American Association for Pediatric
Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Vision screening
recommendations, 2016.
Corrispondenza: eleonora.cosmo@gmail.com