Articolo speciale
L’ambiente familiare di apprendimento (Seconda parte)
The Home learning environment. Part 2: effectiveness of interventions and applicability to the Italian context
Giorgio Tamburlini
Centro per la Salute del Bambino onlus, Trieste
Marzo 2020 - pagg. 167 -176
Abstract
Stemming from the analysis of a successful large scale parenting programme carried out in
Chile (Nadie es Perfecto/Nobody is perfect) within the public health system, the article offers
an overview of the main features of parenting programmes carried out globally and of
the findings of systematic reviews of studies assessing the effects of such programmes. Effectiveness
on child and parental outcomes has been shown for relatively simple and lowcost
interventions, provided that quality requisites are met. Success factors for parenting
programmes have been identified in: the active involvement of families, including in developmental
focused activities carried out with their children; highly professional staff; early
onset of interventions, during the first year of life and even earlier in the prenatal period;
concentration of parenting sessions in a relatively short period of time; inter-sector collaboration.
In Italy, based on global evidence and on experiences carried out so far, programmes
and interventions to support parental skills can be further developed and implemented
starting from the health, education or social sectors, with priority for low-income
communities and through broad community involvement.
Parole chiave
Suggerite dall'AI
Contenuto riservato
Per leggere l'articolo completo è necessario effettuare il login.
Non sei ancora registrato? Registrati
Bibliografia
1. Tamburlini G. L’ambiente familiare di apprendimento.
Prima parte: componenti, interconnessioni
e rilevanza per lo sviluppo precoce del
bambino. Medico e Bambino 2020;39(2):101-10.
2. Chile Crece Contigo. Salud. Nadie es
perfecto. http://www.chccsalud.cl.
3. Carneiro P. Parental beliefs, investments, and
child development: evidence from a large-scale
experiment. IZA Discussion paper No. 12506,
2019.
4. National Research Council, Institute of Medicine.
From neurons to neighborhoods: the
science of early childhood development.
Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA (eds.). Committee on
Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development;
Board on Children, Youth, and Families,
Commission on Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: Nat
Acad Press, 2000.
5. WHO, UNICEF, World Bank. Nurturing care
for early childhood development: a framework
for helping children survive and thrive to transform
health and human potential. Genova, 2018
(versione italiana su: www.csbonlus.org).
6. Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, et al. Nurturing
care: promoting early childhood development.
Lancet 2017;389(10064):91-102.
7. Black ME, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, et al.
Early childhood development coming of age:
science through the life course. Lancet 2017;
389(10064):77-90.
8. WHO, UNICEF, Lancet Commission on Child
Health and Wellbeing. 2020. Lancet, published
online February 18, 2020.
9. Engle PL Black MM, Behrman JR, et al. Strategies
to avoid the loss of developmental potential
in more than 200 million children in the developing
world. Lancet 2007;369(1557): 229-42.
10. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience
as the source of learning and development. FT
press, 2014.
11. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and
action. In: Marks DF. The health psychology
reader. London (UK): SAGE Publications Ltd,
2002.
12. Tamburlini G. Osservatorio. Cartoline pedagogiche.
Medico e Bambino anno 2018.
13. Barnett S. Long term effects of early
childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes.
Future Child 1995;5(3):25-50.
14. National Institute for Early Education Research.
Head start report. http://nieer.org/wp-content/
uploads/2016/12/HS_Digest_States_of_
Head_Start.pdf
15. https://earlydevelopmentresources.com/
pages/abecedarian-approach.
16. Campbell FA, Ramey CT. Effects of early intervention
on intellectual and academic achievement:
a follow-up study of children from low-income
families. Child Development 1994;65(2):
684-98.
17. Garcia JL, Heckman JJ, Leaf DE, Prados MJ.
The life-cycle benefits of an influential early
childhood program. 2016. NBER Working Paper
No. 22993.
18. Bann CM, Wallendar JL, Do B, et al. Homebased
early intervention and the influence of family
resources on cognitive development. Pediatrics
2016;137:4.
19. Olds DL, Kitzman H, Cole R, et al. Effects of
nurse home-visiting on maternal life course and
child development: age 6 follow-up results of a
randomized trial. Pediatrics 2004;114(6):1550-9.
20. https://www.fnp.nhs.uk/about-us/the- programme/.
21. National Evaluation of Sure Start (NESS).
The impact of Sure Start local programmes on
five year olds and their families. Birkbeck University
of London, 2010.
22. Sanders MR. Triple P - Positive Parenting
Program as a public health approach to
strengthening parenting (PDF). J Fam Psychol
2008;22(3):506-17.
23. Coyne JC, Kwakkenbos L. Triple P - Positive
Parenting Programs: the folly of basing social policy
on underpowered flawed studies. BMC Medicine
2013;11(1).
24. Sanders MR, Kirby JN, Tellegen CL, Day JJ.
The Triple P - Positive Parenting Program: a systematic
review and meta-analysis of a multilevel
system of parenting support. Clin Psychol
Rev 2014;34(4):337-57.
25. http://www.incredibleyears.com/.
26. www.genitoripiu.it.
27. Balbinot V, Colombo EM, Malgaroli G, Sila
A, Tamburlini G. Nati per leggere 1999-2019: la
storia, le attività, i risultati. Centro per la Salute
del Bambino, Trieste, settembre 2019.
28. https://www.epicentro.iss.it/materno/ConvegnoSorveglianzaBambino_
02_anni.
29. Tamburlini G. Osservatorio. Un Villaggio per
Crescere. Medico e Bambino anno 2019.
30. www.minori.gov.it/it/il-programma-pippi.
31. Layzer JI, Goodson BD, Bernstein L, Price C.
National evaluation of family support programs.
Volume A: the meta-analysis. Final report. Cambridge,
Mass: Abt Associates Inc. 2001.
32. Barlow J, Smailagic N, Ferriter M, Bennett
C, Jones H. Group-based parent-training programmes
for improving emotional and behavioural
adjustment in children from birth to three
years old. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):
CD003680.
33. Mihelic M, Morawska A, Filus A. Effects of
early parenting interventions on parents and infants:
a meta-analytic review. J Child Fam Stud
2017;26:1507-26.
34. Barlow J, Coren E. The effectiveness of parenting
programs: a review of Campbell reviews.
Research on Social work practice 2017;28:99-102.
35. Ryce SB, Rasmussen IS, Klest SK et al. Effects
of parenting interventions for at-risk parents
with infants: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015707.
36. Lee JY, Knauer HA, Lee SJ, MacEachern
MP, Garfield CF. Father-inclusive perinatal parent
education programs: a systematic review.
Pediatrics 2018;142(1).
37. www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/
guidelines/SR_Caregiving_interventions_ECD_
Jeong_Final_Nov2018.pdf.
38. World Health Organization. Improving early
child development: WHO guideline. WHO, Geneva,
2020.
39. Pierron AL ,Fond-Harment L, Alla F. Supporting
parenting to address social inequalities in
health: A synthesis of systematic reviews. BMC
Public Health 2018;18(1).
40. Mitchell L, Wylie C, Carr M. Outcomes of
early childhood education: literature review report
to the Ministry of Education. New Zealand
Council for Educational Research, 2008.
41. Burger K. How does early childhood care
and education affect cognitive development? An
international review of the effects of early interventions
for children from different social backgrounds.
Elsevier, Early Childhood Research
Quarterly, 2009.
42. Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, et al.
Investing in the foundation of sustainable development:
pathways to scale up for early
childhood development. Lancet 2017;389.
43. Aboud FE, Yousafzai AK. Global health and
development in early childhood (January 2015).
Annu Rev Psychol 2015;66:433-57.
44. Calvin CM, Deary IJ, Fenton C, et al. Intelligence
in youth and all-cause-mortality: systematic
review with meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol
2011;40:626-44.
45. Solomon M, Pistrang N, Barker C. The benefits
of mutual support groups for parents of
children with disabilities. Am J Community Psychol
2001;29:113-32.
46. Marmot M. An inverse care law for our time.
BMJ 2018;362:k3216.
47. Thaler, RH. Behavioral economics: past, present,
and future. American Economic Review
2016;106(7):1577-600.
48. Boggs D, Milner KM, Chandna J, et al.
Rating early child development outcome measurement
tools for routine health programme use.
Arch Dis Child 2019;104:S22-S33.
49. Canali C, Vecchiato T. Valutare le competenze
genitoriali. Studi Zancan, 2012.
50. https://uwm.edu/mcwp/wp-content/ uploads/
sites/337/2015/12/HOME12-1-14. pdf.
49.
51. https://med.nyu.edu/pediatrics/developmental/
research/belle-project/stimq-cognitive-
home-environment.
Corrispondenza: tamburlini@csbonlus.org